James's theorem

From HandWiki

In mathematics, particularly functional analysis, James' theorem, named for Robert C. James, states that a Banach space X is reflexive if and only if every continuous linear functional's norm on X attains its supremum on the closed unit ball in X. A stronger version of the theorem states that a weakly closed subset C of a Banach space X is weakly compact if and only if the dual norm each continuous linear functional on X attains a maximum on C.

The hypothesis of completeness in the theorem cannot be dropped.[1]

Statements

The space X considered can be a real or complex Banach space. Its continuous dual space is denoted by X. The topological dual of ℝ-Banach space deduced from X by any restriction scalar will be denoted X. (It is of interest only if X is a complex space because if X is a -space then X=X.)

James compactness criterion — Let X be a Banach space and A a weakly closed nonempty subset of X. The following conditions are equivalent:

  • A is weakly compact.
  • For every fX, there exists an element a0A such that |f(a0)|=supaA|f(a)|.
  • For any fX, there exists an element a0A such that f(a0)=supaA|f(a)|.
  • For any fX, there exists an element a0A such that f(a0)=supaAf(a).

A Banach space being reflexive if and only if its closed unit ball is weakly compact one deduces from this, since the norm of a continuous linear form is the upper bound of its modulus on this ball:

James' theorem — A Banach space X is reflexive if and only if for all fX, there exists an element aX of norm a1 such that f(a)=f.

History

Historically, these sentences were proved in reverse order. In 1957, James had proved the reflexivity criterion for separable Banach spaces[2] and 1964 for general Banach spaces.[3] Since the reflexivity is equivalent to the weak compactness of the unit sphere, Victor L. Klee reformulated this as a compactness criterion for the unit sphere in 1962 and assumes that this criterion characterizes any weakly compact quantities.[4] This was then actually proved by James in 1964.[5]

See also

Notes

  1. (James 1971)
  2. (James 1957)
  3. (James 1964)
  4. (Klee 1962)
  5. (James 1964)

References