Divisor summatory function

From HandWiki
Error creating thumbnail: Unable to save thumbnail to destination
The summatory function, with leading terms removed, for x<104
The summatory function, with leading terms removed, for x<107
The summatory function, with leading terms removed, for x<107, graphed as a distribution or histogram. The vertical scale is not constant left to right; click on image for a detailed description.

In number theory, the divisor summatory function is a function that is a sum over the divisor function. It frequently occurs in the study of the asymptotic behaviour of the Riemann zeta function. The various studies of the behaviour of the divisor function are sometimes called divisor problems.

Definition

The divisor summatory function is defined as

D(x)=nxd(n)=j,kjkx1

where

d(n)=σ0(n)=j,kjk=n1

is the divisor function. The divisor function counts the number of ways that the integer n can be written as a product of two integers. More generally, one defines

Dk(x)=nxdk(n)=mxmnxdk1(n)

where dk(n) counts the number of ways that n can be written as a product of k numbers. This quantity can be visualized as the count of the number of lattice points fenced off by a hyperbolic surface in k dimensions. Thus, for k=2, D(x) = D2(x) counts the number of points on a square lattice bounded on the left by the vertical-axis, on the bottom by the horizontal-axis, and to the upper-right by the hyperbola jk = x. Roughly, this shape may be envisioned as a hyperbolic simplex. This allows us to provide an alternative expression for D(x), and a simple way to compute it in O(x) time:

D(x)=k=1xxk=2k=1uxku2, where u=x

If the hyperbola in this context is replaced by a circle then determining the value of the resulting function is known as the Gauss circle problem.

Sequence of D(n)(sequence A006218 in the OEIS):
0, 1, 3, 5, 8, 10, 14, 16, 20, 23, 27, 29, 35, 37, 41, 45, 50, 52, 58, 60, 66, 70, 74, 76, 84, 87, 91, 95, 101, 103, 111, ...

Dirichlet's divisor problem

Finding a closed form for this summed expression seems to be beyond the techniques available, but it is possible to give approximations. The leading behavior of the series is given by

D(x)=xlogx+x(2γ1)+Δ(x) 

where γ is the Euler–Mascheroni constant, and the error term is

Δ(x)=O(x).

Here, O denotes Big-O notation. This estimate can be proven using the Dirichlet hyperbola method, and was first established by Dirichlet in 1849.[1]:37–38,69 The Dirichlet divisor problem, precisely stated, is to improve this error bound by finding the smallest value of θ for which

Δ(x)=O(xθ+ϵ)

holds true for all ϵ>0. As of today, this problem remains unsolved. Progress has been slow. Many of the same methods work for this problem and for Gauss's circle problem, another lattice-point counting problem. Section F1 of Unsolved Problems in Number Theory [2] surveys what is known and not known about these problems.

  • In 1904, G. Voronoi proved that the error term can be improved to O(x1/3logx). [3]:381
  • In 1916, G. H. Hardy showed that infθ1/4. In particular, he demonstrated that for some constant K, there exist values of x for which Δ(x)>Kx1/4 and values of x for which Δ(x)<Kx1/4.[1]:69
  • In 1922, J. van der Corput improved Dirichlet's bound to infθ33/100=0.33.[3]:381
  • In 1928, J. van der Corput proved that infθ27/82=0.329268.[3]:381
  • In 1950, Chih Tsung-tao and independently in 1953 H. E. Richert proved that infθ15/46=0.32608695652....[3]:381
  • In 1969, Grigori Kolesnik demonstrated that infθ12/37=0.324.[3]:381
  • In 1973, Grigori Kolesnik demonstrated that infθ346/1067=0.32427366448....[3]:381
  • In 1982, Grigori Kolesnik demonstrated that infθ35/108=0.32407.[3]:381
  • In 1988, H. Iwaniec and C. J. Mozzochi proved that infθ7/22=0.318.[4]
  • In 2003, M.N. Huxley improved this to show that infθ131/416=0.31490384615....[5]

So, infθ lies somewhere between 1/4 and 131/416 (approx. 0.3149); it is widely conjectured to be 1/4. Theoretical evidence lends credence to this conjecture, since Δ(x)/x1/4 has a (non-Gaussian) limiting distribution.[6] The value of 1/4 would also follow from a conjecture on exponent pairs.[7]

Piltz divisor problem

In the generalized case, one has

Dk(x)=xPk(logx)+Δk(x)

where Pk is a polynomial of degree k1. Using simple estimates, it is readily shown that

Δk(x)=O(x11/klogk2x)

for integer k2. As in the k=2 case, the infimum of the bound is not known for any value of k. Computing these infima is known as the Piltz divisor problem, after the name of the German mathematician Adolf Piltz (also see his German page). Defining the order αk as the smallest value for which Δk(x)=O(xαk+ε) holds, for any ε>0, one has the following results (note that α2 is the θ of the previous section):

α2131416 ,[5]


α34396 ,[8] and[9]


αk3k44k(4k8)α93554 ,α104160 ,α11710αkk2k+2(12k25)αkk1k+4(26k50)αk31k9832k(51k57)αk7k347k(k58)
  • E. C. Titchmarsh conjectures that αk=k12k .

Mellin transform

Both portions may be expressed as Mellin transforms:

D(x)=12πicic+iζ2(w)xwwdw

for c>1. Here, ζ(s) is the Riemann zeta function. Similarly, one has

Δ(x)=12πicic+iζ2(w)xwwdw

with 0<c<1. The leading term of D(x) is obtained by shifting the contour past the double pole at w=1: the leading term is just the residue, by Cauchy's integral formula. In general, one has

Dk(x)=12πicic+iζk(w)xwwdw

and likewise for Δk(x), for k2.

Notes

  1. 1.0 1.1 Montgomery, Hugh; R. C. Vaughan (2007). Multiplicative Number Theory I: Classical Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-521-84903-6. 
  2. Guy, Richard K. (2004). Unsolved Problems in Number Theory (3rd ed.). Berlin: Springer. ISBN 978-0-387-20860-2. 
  3. 3.0 3.1 3.2 3.3 3.4 3.5 3.6 Ivic, Aleksandar (2003). The Riemann Zeta-Function. New York: Dover Publications. ISBN 0-486-42813-3. 
  4. Iwaniec, H.; C. J. Mozzochi (1988). "On the divisor and circle problems". Journal of Number Theory 29: 60–93. doi:10.1016/0022-314X(88)90093-5. 
  5. 5.0 5.1 Huxley, M. N. (2003). "Exponential sums and lattice points III". Proc. London Math. Soc. 87 (3): 591–609. doi:10.1112/S0024611503014485. ISSN 0024-6115. 
  6. Heath-Brown, D. R. (1992). "The distribution and moments of the error term in the Dirichlet divisor problem". Acta Arithmetica 60 (4): 389–415. doi:10.4064/aa-60-4-389-415. ISSN 0065-1036. "Theorem 1 The function has a distribution function". 
  7. Montgomery, Hugh L. (1994). Ten lectures on the interface between analytic number theory and harmonic analysis. Regional Conference Series in Mathematics. 84. Providence, RI: American Mathematical Society. p. 59. ISBN 0-8218-0737-4. 
  8. G. Kolesnik. On the estimation of multiple exponential sums, in "Recent Progress in Analytic Number Theory", Symposium Durham 1979 (Vol. 1), Academic, London, 1981, pp. 231–246.
  9. Aleksandar Ivić. The Theory of the Riemann Zeta-function with Applications (Theorem 13.2). John Wiley and Sons 1985.

References

  • H.M. Edwards, Riemann's Zeta Function, (1974) Dover Publications, ISBN:0-486-41740-9
  • E. C. Titchmarsh, The theory of the Riemann Zeta-Function, (1951) Oxford at the Clarendon Press, Oxford. (See chapter 12 for a discussion of the generalized divisor problem)
  • Apostol, Tom M. (1976), Introduction to analytic number theory, Undergraduate Texts in Mathematics, New York-Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag, ISBN 978-0-387-90163-3  (Provides an introductory statement of the Dirichlet divisor problem.)
  • H. E. Rose. A Course in Number Theory., Oxford, 1988.
  • M.N. Huxley (2003) 'Exponential Sums and Lattice Points III', Proc. London Math. Soc. (3)87: 591–609