Presheaf with transfers

From HandWiki

In algebraic geometry, a presheaf with transfers is, roughly, a presheaf that, like cohomology theory, comes with pushforwards, “transfer” maps. Precisely, it is, by definition, a contravariant additive functor from the category of finite correspondences (defined below) to the category of abelian groups (in category theory, “presheaf” is another term for a contravariant functor). When a presheaf F with transfers is restricted to the subcategory of smooth separated schemes, it can be viewed as a presheaf on the category with extra maps F(Y)F(X), not coming from morphisms of schemes but also from finite correspondences from X to Y

A presheaf F with transfers is said to be 𝔸1-homotopy invariant if F(X)F(X×𝔸1) for every X.

For example, Chow groups as well as motivic cohomology groups form presheaves with transfers.

Finite correspondence

Let X,Y be algebraic schemes (i.e., separated and of finite type over a field) and suppose X is smooth. Then an elementary correspondence is an irreducible closed subscheme WXi×Y, Xi some connected component of X, such that the projection Supp(W)Xi is finite and surjective.[1] Let Cor(X,Y) be the free abelian group generated by elementary correspondences from X to Y; elements of Cor(X,Y) are then called finite correspondences.

The category of finite correspondences, denoted by Cor, is the category where the objects are smooth algebraic schemes over a field; where a Hom set is given as: Hom(X,Y)=Cor(X,Y) and where the composition is defined as in intersection theory: given elementary correspondences α from X to Y and β from Y to Z, their composition is:

βα=p13,*(p12*αp23*β)

where denotes the intersection product and p12:X×Y×ZX×Y, etc. Note that the category Cor is an additive category since each Hom set Cor(X,Y) is an abelian group.

This category contains the category Sm of smooth algebraic schemes as a subcategory in the following sense: there is a faithful functor SmCor that sends an object to itself and a morphism f:XY to the graph of f.

With the product of schemes taken as the monoid operation, the category Cor is a symmetric monoidal category.

Sheaves with transfers

The basic notion underlying all of the different theories are presheaves with transfers. These are contravariant additive functors

F:CorkAb

and their associated category is typically denoted

𝐏𝐒𝐓(k)

, or just

𝐏𝐒𝐓

if the underlying field is understood. Each of the categories in this section are abelian categories, hence they are suitable for doing homological algebra.

Etale sheaves with transfers

These are defined as presheaves with transfers such that the restriction to any scheme

X

is an etale sheaf. That is, if

UX

is an etale cover, and

F

is a presheaf with transfers, it is an Etale sheaf with transfers if the sequence

0F(X)diagF(U)(+,)F(U×XU)

is exact and there is an isomorphism

F(XY)=F(X)F(Y)

for any fixed smooth schemes

X,Y

.

Nisnevich sheaves with transfers

There is a similar definition for Nisnevich sheaf with transfers, where the Etale topology is switched with the Nisnevich topology.

Examples

Units

The sheaf of units

𝒪*

is a presheaf with transfers. Any correspondence

WX×Y

induces a finite map of degree

N

over

X

, hence there is the induced morphism

𝒪*(Y)𝒪*(W)N𝒪*(X)

[2]

showing it is a presheaf with transfers.

Representable functors

One of the basic examples of presheaves with transfers are given by representable functors. Given a smooth scheme X there is a presheaf with transfers tr(X) sending UHomCor(U,X).[2]

Representable functor associated to a point

The associated presheaf with transfers of Spec(k) is denoted .

Pointed schemes

Another class of elementary examples comes from pointed schemes (X,x) with x:Spec(k)X. This morphism induces a morphism x*:tr(X) whose cokernel is denoted tr(X,x). There is a splitting coming from the structure morphism XSpec(k), so there is an induced map tr(X), hence tr(X)tr(X,x).

Representable functor associated to A1-0

There is a representable functor associated to the pointed scheme 𝔾m=(𝔸1{0},1) denoted tr(𝔾m).

Smash product of pointed schemes

Given a finite family of pointed schemes

(Xi,xi)

there is an associated presheaf with transfers

tr((X1,x1)(Xn,xn))

, also denoted

tr(X1Xn)

[2] from their Smash product. This is defined as the cokernel of

coker(itr(X1××X^i××Xn)id××xi××idtr(X1××Xn))

For example, given two pointed schemes

(X,x),(Y,y)

, there is the associated presheaf with transfers

tr(XY)

equal to the cokernel of

tr(X)tr(Y)[1×yx×1]tr(X×Y)

[3]

This is analogous to the smash product in topology since

XY=(X×Y)/(XY)

where the equivalence relation mods out

X×{y}{x}×Y

.

Wedge of single space

A finite wedge of a pointed space (X,x) is denoted tr(Xq)=tr(XX). One example of this construction is tr(𝔾mq), which is used in the definition of the motivic complexes (q) used in Motivic cohomology.

Homotopy invariant sheaves

A presheaf with transfers F is homotopy invariant if the projection morphism p:X×𝔸1X induces an isomorphism p*:F(X)F(X×𝔸1) for every smooth scheme X. There is a construction associating a homotopy invariant sheaf[2] for every presheaf with transfers F using an analogue of simplicial homology.

Simplicial homology

There is a scheme

Δn=Spec(k[x0,,xn]0inxi1)

giving a cosimplicial scheme

Δ*

, where the morphisms

j:ΔnΔn+1

are given by

xj=0

. That is,

k[x0,,xn+1](0inxi1)k[x0,,xn+1](0inxi1,xj)

gives the induced morphism

j

. Then, to a presheaf with transfers

F

, there is an associated complex of presheaves with transfers

C*F

sending

CiF:UF(U×Δi)

and has the induced chain morphisms

i=0j(1)ii*:CjFCj1F

giving a complex of presheaves with transfers. The homology invaritant presheaves with transfers

Hi(C*F)

are homotopy invariant. In particular,

H0(C*F)

is the universal homotopy invariant presheaf with transfers associated to

F

.

Relation with Chow group of zero cycles

Denote H0sing(X/k):=H0(C*tr(X))(Spec(k)). There is an induced surjection H0sing(X/k)CH0(X) which is an isomorphism for X projective.

Zeroth homology of Ztr(X)

The zeroth homology of H0(C*tr(Y))(X) is HomCor(X,Y)/𝔸1 homotopy where homotopy equivalence is given as follows. Two finite correspondences f,g:XY are 𝔸1-homotopy equivalent if there is a morphism h:X×𝔸1X such that h|X×0=f and h|X×1=g.

Motivic complexes

For Voevodsky's category of mixed motives, the motive

M(X)

associated to

X

, is the class of

C*tr(X)

in

DMNiseff,(k,R)

. One of the elementary motivic complexes are

(q)

for

q1

, defined by the class of

(q)=C*tr(𝔾mq)[q]

[2]

For an abelian group

A

, such as

/

, there is a motivic complex

A(q)=(q)A

. These give the motivic cohomology groups defined by

Hp,q(X,)=Zarp(X,(q))

since the motivic complexes

(q)

restrict to a complex of Zariksi sheaves of

X

.[2] These are called the

p

-th motivic cohomology groups of weight

q

. They can also be extended to any abelian group

A

,

Hp,q(X,A)=Zarp(X,A(q))

giving motivic cohomology with coefficients in

A

of weight

q

.

Special cases

There are a few special cases which can be analyzed explicitly. Namely, when q=0,1. These results can be found in the fourth lecture of the Clay Math book.

Z(0)

In this case,

(0)tr(𝔾m0)

which is quasi-isomorphic to

(top of page 17),[2] hence the weight

0

cohomology groups are isomorphic to

Hp,0(X,)={(X)if p=00otherwise

where

(X)=HomCor(X,Spec(k))

. Since an open cover

Z(1)

This case requires more work, but the end result is a quasi-isomorphism between

(1)

and

𝒪*[1]

. This gives the two motivic cohomology groups

H1,1(X,)=HZar0(X,𝒪*)=𝒪*(X)H2,1(X,)=HZar1(X,𝒪*)=Pic(X)

where the middle cohomology groups are Zariski cohomology.

General case: Z(n)

In general, over a perfect field

k

, there is a nice description of

(n)

in terms of presheaves with transfer

tr(n)

. There is a quasi-ismorphism

C*(tr(n)/tr(n1))C*tr(𝔾mq)[n]

hence

(n)C*(tr(n)/tr(n1))[2n]

which is found using splitting techniques along with a series of quasi-isomorphisms. The details are in lecture 15 of the Clay Math book.

See also

References

  1. Carlo, Voevodsky & Weibel 2006, Definition 1.1.
  2. 2.0 2.1 2.2 2.3 2.4 2.5 2.6 Lecture Notes on Motivic Cohomology. Clay Math. pp. 13,15-16,17,21,22. http://www.claymath.org/library/monographs/cmim02.pdf. 
  3. Note XX×{y} giving tr(X×{y})tr(X)
  • Mazza, Carlo; Voevodsky, Vladimir; Weibel, Charles (2006), Lecture notes on motivic cohomology, Clay Mathematics Monographs, 2, Providence, R.I.: American Mathematical Society, ISBN 978-0-8218-3847-1