Omega constant

From HandWiki

The omega constant is a mathematical constant defined as the unique real number that satisfies the equation

ΩeΩ=1.

It is the value of W(1), where W is Lambert's W function. The name is derived[citation needed] from the alternate name for Lambert's W function, the omega function. The numerical value of Ω is given by

Ω = 0.567143290409783872999968662210... (sequence A030178 in the OEIS).
1/Ω = 1.763222834351896710225201776951... (sequence A030797 in the OEIS).

Properties

Fixed point representation

The defining identity can be expressed, for example, as

ln(1Ω)=Ω.

or

ln(Ω)=Ω

as well as

eΩ=Ω.

Computation

One can calculate Ω iteratively, by starting with an initial guess Ω0, and considering the sequence

Ωn+1=eΩn.

This sequence will converge to Ω as n approaches infinity. This is because Ω is an attractive fixed point of the function ex.

It is much more efficient to use the iteration

Ωn+1=1+Ωn1+eΩn,

because the function

f(x)=1+x1+ex,

in addition to having the same fixed point, also has a derivative that vanishes there. This guarantees quadratic convergence; that is, the number of correct digits is roughly doubled with each iteration.

Using Halley's method, Ω can be approximated with cubic convergence (the number of correct digits is roughly tripled with each iteration): (see also Lambert W function § Numerical evaluation).

Ωj+1=ΩjΩjeΩj1eΩj(Ωj+1)(Ωj+2)(ΩjeΩj1)2Ωj+2.

Integral representations

An identity due to Victor Adamchik[citation needed] is given by the relationship

dt(ett)2+π2=11+Ω.

Other relations due to Mező[1][2] and Kalugin-Jeffrey-Corless[3] are:

Ω=1πRe0πlog(eeiteiteeiteit)dt,
Ω=1π0πlog(1+sinttetcott)dt.

The latter two identities can be extended to other values of the W function (see also Lambert W function § Representations).

Transcendence

The constant Ω is transcendental. This can be seen as a direct consequence of the Lindemann–Weierstrass theorem. For a contradiction, suppose that Ω is algebraic. By the theorem, e−Ω is transcendental, but Ω = e−Ω, which is a contradiction. Therefore, it must be transcendental.[4]

References

  1. Mező, István. "An integral representation for the principal branch of the Lambert W function". https://sites.google.com/site/istvanmezo81/other-things. 
  2. Mező, István (2020). "An integral representation for the Lambert W function". arXiv:2012.02480 [math.CA]..
  3. Kalugin, German A.; Jeffrey, David J.; Corless, Robert M. (2011). "Stieltjes, Poisson and other integral representations for functions of Lambert W". arXiv:1103.5640 [math.CV]..
  4. Mező, István; Baricz, Árpád (November 2017). "On the Generalization of the Lambert W Function". Transactions of the American Mathematical Society 369 (11): 7928. https://www.ams.org/journals/tran/2017-369-11/S0002-9947-2017-06911-7/S0002-9947-2017-06911-7.pdf. Retrieved 28 April 2023.