Nodal decomposition

From HandWiki
Nodal decomposition.

In category theory, an abstract mathematical discipline, a nodal decomposition[1] of a morphism

φ:XY

is a representation of

φ

as a product

φ=σβπ

, where

π

is a strong epimorphism,[2][3][4]

β

a bimorphism, and

σ

a strong monomorphism.[5][3][4]

Uniqueness and notations

Uniqueness of the nodal decomposition.

If it exists, the nodal decomposition is unique up to an isomorphism in the following sense: for any two nodal decompositions

φ=σβπ

and

φ=σβπ

there exist isomorphisms

η

and

θ

such that

π=ηπ,
β=θβη,
σ=σθ.
Notations.

This property justifies some special notations for the elements of the nodal decomposition:

π=coimφ,P=Coimφ,β=redφ,σ=imφ,Q=Imφ,

– here coimφ and Coimφ are called the nodal coimage of φ, imφ and Imφ the nodal image of φ, and redφ the nodal reduced part of φ.

In these notations the nodal decomposition takes the form

φ=imφredφcoimφ.

Connection with the basic decomposition in pre-abelian categories

In a pre-abelian category 𝒦 each morphism φ has a standard decomposition

φ=imφredφcoimφ,

called the basic decomposition (here imφ=ker(cokerφ), coimφ=coker(kerφ), and redφ are respectively the image, the coimage and the reduced part of the morphism φ).

Nodal and basic decompositions.

If a morphism

φ

in a pre-abelian category

𝒦

has a nodal decomposition, then there exist morphisms

η

and

θ

which (being not necessarily isomorphisms) connect the nodal decomposition with the basic decomposition by the following identities:

coimφ=ηcoimφ,
redφ=θredφη,
imφ=imφθ.

Categories with nodal decomposition

A category 𝒦 is called a category with nodal decomposition[1] if each morphism φ has a nodal decomposition in 𝒦. This property plays an important role in constructing envelopes and refinements in 𝒦.

In an abelian category 𝒦 the basic decomposition

φ=imφredφcoimφ

is always nodal. As a corollary, all abelian categories have nodal decomposition.

If a pre-abelian category 𝒦 is linearly complete,[6] well-powered in strong monomorphisms[7] and co-well-powered in strong epimorphisms,[8] then 𝒦 has nodal decomposition.[9]

More generally, suppose a category 𝒦 is linearly complete,[6] well-powered in strong monomorphisms,[7] co-well-powered in strong epimorphisms,[8] and in addition strong epimorphisms discern monomorphisms[10] in 𝒦, and, dually, strong monomorphisms discern epimorphisms[11] in 𝒦, then 𝒦 has nodal decomposition.[12]

The category Ste of stereotype spaces (being non-abelian) has nodal decomposition,[13] as well as the (non-additive) category SteAlg of stereotype algebras .[14]

Notes

  1. 1.0 1.1 Akbarov 2016, p. 28.
  2. An epimorphism ε:AB is said to be strong, if for any monomorphism μ:CD and for any morphisms α:AC and β:BD such that βε=μα there exists a morphism δ:BC, such that δε=α and μδ=β. thumb
  3. 3.0 3.1 Borceux 1994.
  4. 4.0 4.1 Tsalenko 1974.
  5. A monomorphism μ:CD is said to be strong, if for any epimorphism ε:AB and for any morphisms α:AC and β:BD such that βε=μα there exists a morphism δ:BC, such that δε=α and μδ=β
  6. 6.0 6.1 A category 𝒦 is said to be linearly complete, if any functor from a linearly ordered set into 𝒦 has direct and inverse limits.
  7. 7.0 7.1 A category 𝒦 is said to be well-powered in strong monomorphisms, if for each object X the category SMono(X) of all strong monomorphisms into X is skeletally small (i.e. has a skeleton which is a set).
  8. 8.0 8.1 A category 𝒦 is said to be co-well-powered in strong epimorphisms, if for each object X the category SEpi(X) of all strong epimorphisms from X is skeletally small (i.e. has a skeleton which is a set).
  9. Akbarov 2016, p. 37.
  10. It is said that strong epimorphisms discern monomorphisms in a category 𝒦, if each morphism μ, which is not a monomorphism, can be represented as a composition μ=με, where ε is a strong epimorphism which is not an isomorphism.
  11. It is said that strong monomorphisms discern epimorphisms in a category 𝒦, if each morphism ε, which is not an epimorphism, can be represented as a composition ε=με, where μ is a strong monomorphism which is not an isomorphism.
  12. Akbarov 2016, p. 31.
  13. Akbarov 2016, p. 142.
  14. Akbarov 2016, p. 164.

References