Multiplicative partition

From HandWiki

In number theory, a multiplicative partition or unordered factorization of an integer n is a way of writing n as a product of integers greater than 1, treating two products as equivalent if they differ only in the ordering of the factors. The number n is itself considered one of these products. Multiplicative partitions closely parallel the study of multipartite partitions,[1] which are additive partitions of finite sequences of positive integers, with the addition made pointwise. Although the study of multiplicative partitions has been ongoing since at least 1923, the name "multiplicative partition" appears to have been introduced by (Hughes Shallit).[2] The Latin name "factorisatio numerorum" had been used previously. MathWorld uses the term unordered factorization.

Examples

  • The number 20 has four multiplicative partitions: 2 × 2 × 5, 2 × 10, 4 × 5, and 20.
  • 3 × 3 × 3 × 3, 3 × 3 × 9, 3 × 27, 9 × 9, and 81 are the five multiplicative partitions of 81 = 34. Because it is the fourth power of a prime, 81 has the same number (five) of multiplicative partitions as 4 does of additive partitions.
  • The number 30 has five multiplicative partitions: 2 × 3 × 5 = 2 × 15 = 6 × 5 = 3 × 10 = 30.
  • In general, the number of multiplicative partitions of a squarefree number with i prime factors is the ith Bell number, Bi.

Application

(Hughes Shallit) describe an application of multiplicative partitions in classifying integers with a given number of divisors. For example, the integers with exactly 12 divisors take the forms p11, pq5, p2q3, and pqr2, where p, q, and r are distinct prime numbers; these forms correspond to the multiplicative partitions 12, 26, 34, and 223 respectively. More generally, for each multiplicative partition k=ti of the integer k, there corresponds a class of integers having exactly k divisors, of the form

piti1,

where each pi is a distinct prime. This correspondence follows from the multiplicative property of the divisor function.[2]

Bounds on the number of partitions

(Oppenheim 1926) credits (MacMahon 1923) with the problem of counting the number of multiplicative partitions of n;[3][4] this problem has since been studied by others under the Latin name of factorisatio numerorum. If the number of multiplicative partitions of n is an, McMahon and Oppenheim observed that its Dirichlet series generating function f(s) has the product representation[3][4] f(s)=n=1anns=k=211ks.

The sequence of numbers an begins

1, 1, 1, 2, 1, 2, 1, 3, 2, 2, 1, 4, 1, 2, 2, 5, 1, 4, 1, 4, 2, 2, 1, 7, 2, 2, 3, 4, 1, 5, 1, 7, 2, 2, 2, 9, 1, 2, 2, ... (sequence A001055 in the OEIS).

Oppenheim also claimed an upper bound on an, of the form[3] ann(explognlogloglognloglogn)2+o(1), but as (Canfield Erdős) showed, this bound is erroneous and the true bound is[5] ann(explognlogloglognloglogn)1+o(1).

Both of these bounds are not far from linear in n: they are of the form n1o(1). However, the typical value of an is much smaller: the average value of an, averaged over an interval xnx+N, is a¯=exp(4logN2eloglogN(1+o(1))), a bound that is of the form no(1).[6]

Additional results

(Canfield Erdős) observe, and (Luca Mukhopadhyay) prove, that most numbers cannot arise as the number an of multiplicative partitions of some n: the number of values less than N which arise in this way is NO(logloglogN/loglogN).[5][6] Additionally, Luca et al. show that most values of n are not multiples of an: the number of values nN such that an divides n is O(N/log1+o(1)N).[6]

See also

References

  1. Andrews, G. (1976), The Theory of Partitions, Addison-Wesley , chapter 12
  2. 2.0 2.1 Hughes, John F.; Shallit, Jeffrey (1983), "On the number of multiplicative partitions", American Mathematical Monthly 90 (7): 468–471, doi:10.2307/2975729 
  3. 3.0 3.1 3.2 Oppenheim, A. (1926), "On an arithmetic function", Journal of the London Mathematical Society 1 (4): 205–211, doi:10.1112/jlms/s1-1.4.205 
  4. 4.0 4.1 MacMahon, P. A. (1923), "Dirichlet series and the theory of partitions", Proceedings of the London Mathematical Society 22: 404–411, doi:10.1112/plms/s2-22.1.404 
  5. 5.0 5.1 Canfield, E. R.; Erdős, Paul; Pomerance, Carl (1983), "On a problem of Oppenheim concerning 'factorisatio numerorum'", Journal of Number Theory 17 (1): 1–28, doi:10.1016/0022-314X(83)90002-1 
  6. 6.0 6.1 6.2 Luca, Florian; Mukhopadhyay, Anirban; Srinivas, Kotyada (2010), "Some results on Oppenheim's 'factorisatio numerorum' function", Acta Arithmetica 142 (1): 41–50, doi:10.4064/aa142-1-3 

Further reading