Generalizations of Pauli matrices

From HandWiki

In mathematics and physics, in particular quantum information, the term generalized Pauli matrices refers to families of matrices which generalize the (linear algebraic) properties of the Pauli matrices. Here, a few classes of such matrices are summarized.

Multi-qubit Pauli matrices (Hermitian)

This method of generalizing the Pauli matrices refers to a generalization from a single 2-level system (qubit) to multiple such systems. In particular, the generalized Pauli matrices for a group of N qubits is just the set of matrices generated by all possible products of Pauli matrices on any of the qubits.[1]

The vector space of a single qubit is V1=2 and the vector space of N qubits is VN=(2)N2N. We use the tensor product notation

σa(n)=I(1)I(n1)σaI(n+1)I(N),a=1,2,3

to refer to the operator on VN that acts as a Pauli matrix on the nth qubit and the identity on all other qubits. We can also use a=0 for the identity, i.e., for any n we use σ0(n)=m=1NI(m). Then the multi-qubit Pauli matrices are all matrices of the form

σa:=n=1Nσan(n)=σa1(1)σaN(N),a=(a1,,aN){0,1,2,3}×N,

i.e., for a a vector of integers between 0 and 4. Thus there are 4N such generalized Pauli matrices if we include the identity I=m=1NI(m) and 4N1 if we do not.

Higher spin matrices (Hermitian)

The traditional Pauli matrices are the matrix representation of the 𝔰𝔲(2) Lie algebra generators Jx, Jy, and Jz in the 2-dimensional irreducible representation of SU(2), corresponding to a spin-1/2 particle. These generate the Lie group SU(2).

For a general particle of spin s=0,1/2,1,3/2,2,, one instead utilizes the 2s+1-dimensional irreducible representation.


Generalized Gell-Mann matrices (Hermitian)

This method of generalizing the Pauli matrices refers to a generalization from 2-level systems (Pauli matrices acting on qubits) to 3-level systems (Gell-Mann matrices acting on qutrits) and generic d-level systems (generalized Gell-Mann matrices acting on qudits).

Construction

Let Ejk be the matrix with 1 in the jk-th entry and 0 elsewhere. Consider the space of d×d complex matrices, d×d, for a fixed d.

Define the following matrices,

fk,jd={Ekj+Ejkfor k<j,i(EjkEkj)for k>j.

and

hkd={Idfor k=1,hkd10for 1<k<d,2d(d1)(h1d1(1d))=2d(d1)(Id1(1d))for k=d

The collection of matrices defined above without the identity matrix are called the generalized Gell-Mann matrices, in dimension d.[2][3] The symbol ⊕ (utilized in the Cartan subalgebra above) means matrix direct sum.

The generalized Gell-Mann matrices are Hermitian and traceless by construction, just like the Pauli matrices. One can also check that they are orthogonal in the Hilbert–Schmidt inner product on d×d. By dimension count, one sees that they span the vector space of d×d complex matrices, 𝔤𝔩(d,). They then provide a Lie-algebra-generator basis acting on the fundamental representation of 𝔰𝔲(d).

In dimensions d = 2 and 3, the above construction recovers the Pauli and Gell-Mann matrices, respectively.

Sylvester's generalized Pauli matrices (non-Hermitian)

A particularly notable generalization of the Pauli matrices was constructed by James Joseph Sylvester in 1882.[4] These are known as "Weyl–Heisenberg matrices" as well as "generalized Pauli matrices".[5][6]

Framing

The Pauli matrices σ1 and σ3 satisfy the following:

σ12=σ32=I,σ1σ3=σ3σ1=eπiσ3σ1.

The so-called Walsh–Hadamard conjugation matrix is

W=12[1111].

Like the Pauli matrices, W is both Hermitian and unitary. σ1,σ3 and W satisfy the relation

σ1=Wσ3W*.

The goal now is to extend the above to higher dimensions, d.

Construction: The clock and shift matrices

Fix the dimension d as before. Let ω=exp(2πi/d), a root of unity. Since ωd=1 and ω1, the sum of all roots annuls:

1+ω++ωd1=0.

Integer indices may then be cyclically identified mod d.

Now define, with Sylvester, the shift matrix

Σ1=[0000110000010000010000010]

and the clock matrix,

Σ3=[10000ω0000ω20000ωd1].

These matrices generalize σ1 and σ3, respectively.

Note that the unitarity and tracelessness of the two Pauli matrices is preserved, but not Hermiticity in dimensions higher than two. Since Pauli matrices describe quaternions, Sylvester dubbed the higher-dimensional analogs "nonions", "sedenions", etc.

These two matrices are also the cornerstone of quantum mechanical dynamics in finite-dimensional vector spaces[7][8][9] as formulated by Hermann Weyl, and they find routine applications in numerous areas of mathematical physics.[10] The clock matrix amounts to the exponential of position in a "clock" of d hours, and the shift matrix is just the translation operator in that cyclic vector space, so the exponential of the momentum. They are (finite-dimensional) representations of the corresponding elements of the Weyl-Heisenberg group on a d-dimensional Hilbert space.

The following relations echo and generalize those of the Pauli matrices:

Σ1d=Σ3d=I

and the braiding relation,

Σ3Σ1=ωΣ1Σ3=e2πi/dΣ1Σ3,

the Weyl formulation of the CCR, and can be rewritten as

Σ3Σ1Σ3d1Σ1d1=ω.

On the other hand, to generalize the Walsh–Hadamard matrix W, note

W=12[111ω21]=12[111ωd1].

Define, again with Sylvester, the following analog matrix,[11] still denoted by W in a slight abuse of notation,

W=1d[11111ωd1ω2(d1)ω(d1)21ωd2ω2(d2)ω(d1)(d2)1ωω2ωd1].

It is evident that W is no longer Hermitian, but is still unitary. Direct calculation yields

Σ1=WΣ3W*,

which is the desired analog result. Thus, W, a Vandermonde matrix, arrays the eigenvectors of Σ1, which has the same eigenvalues as Σ3.

When d=2k, W* is precisely the discrete Fourier transform matrix, converting position coordinates to momentum coordinates and vice versa.

Definition

The complete family of d2 unitary (but non-Hermitian) independent matrices {σk,j}k,j=1d is defined as follows:

σk,j:=(Σ1)k(Σ3)j=m=0d1|m+kωjmm|.

This provides Sylvester's well-known trace-orthogonal basis for 𝔤𝔩(d,), known as "nonions" 𝔤𝔩(3,), "sedenions" 𝔤𝔩(4,), etc...[12][13]

This basis can be systematically connected to the above Hermitian basis.[14] (For instance, the powers of Σ3, the Cartan subalgebra, map to linear combinations of the hkd matrices.) It can further be used to identify 𝔤𝔩(d,), as d, with the algebra of Poisson brackets.

Properties

With respect to the Hilbert–Schmidt inner product on operators, A,BHS=Tr(A*B), Sylvester's generalized Pauli operators are orthogonal and normalized to d:

σk,j,σk,jHS=δkkδjjσk,jHS2=dδkkδjj.

This can be checked directly from the above definition of σk,j.

See also

Notes

  1. Brown, Adam R.; Susskind, Leonard (2018-04-25). "Second law of quantum complexity". Physical Review D 97 (8): 086015. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.97.086015. Bibcode2018PhRvD..97h6015B. 
  2. Kimura, G. (2003). "The Bloch vector for N-level systems". Physics Letters A 314 (5–6): 339–349. doi:10.1016/S0375-9601(03)00941-1. Bibcode2003PhLA..314..339K. 
  3. Bertlmann, Reinhold A.; Philipp Krammer (2008-06-13). "Bloch vectors for qudits". Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical 41 (23): 235303. doi:10.1088/1751-8113/41/23/235303. ISSN 1751-8121. Bibcode2008JPhA...41w5303B. 
  4. Sylvester, J. J., (1882), Johns Hopkins University Circulars I: 241-242; ibid II (1883) 46; ibid III (1884) 7–9. Summarized in The Collected Mathematics Papers of James Joseph Sylvester (Cambridge University Press, 1909) v III . online and further.
  5. Appleby, D. M. (May 2005). "Symmetric informationally complete–positive operator valued measures and the extended Clifford group" (in en). Journal of Mathematical Physics 46 (5): 052107. doi:10.1063/1.1896384. ISSN 0022-2488. Bibcode2005JMP....46e2107A. http://aip.scitation.org/doi/10.1063/1.1896384. 
  6. Howard, Mark; Vala, Jiri (2012-08-15). "Qudit versions of the qubit π / 8 gate" (in en). Physical Review A 86 (2): 022316. doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.86.022316. ISSN 1050-2947. Bibcode2012PhRvA..86b2316H. https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevA.86.022316. 
  7. Weyl, H., "Quantenmechanik und Gruppentheorie", Zeitschrift für Physik, 46 (1927) pp. 1–46, doi:10.1007/BF02055756.
  8. Weyl, H., The Theory of Groups and Quantum Mechanics (Dover, New York, 1931)
  9. Santhanam, T. S.; Tekumalla, A. R. (1976). "Quantum mechanics in finite dimensions". Foundations of Physics 6 (5): 583. doi:10.1007/BF00715110. Bibcode1976FoPh....6..583S. 
  10. For a serviceable review, see Vourdas A. (2004), "Quantum systems with finite Hilbert space", Rep. Prog. Phys. 67 267. doi:10.1088/0034-4885/67/3/R03.
  11. Sylvester, J.J. (1867). "Thoughts on inverse orthogonal matrices, simultaneous sign-successions, and tessellated pavements in two or more colours, with applications to Newton's rule, ornamental tile-work, and the theory of numbers". The London, Edinburgh, and Dublin Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science 34 (232): 461–475. doi:10.1080/14786446708639914. 
  12. Patera, J.; Zassenhaus, H. (1988). "The Pauli matrices in n dimensions and finest gradings of simple Lie algebras of type An−1". Journal of Mathematical Physics 29 (3): 665. doi:10.1063/1.528006. Bibcode1988JMP....29..665P. 
  13. Since all indices are defined cyclically mod d, trΣ1jΣ3kΣ1mΣ3n=ωkmdδj+m,0δk+n,0.
  14. Fairlie, D. B.; Fletcher, P.; Zachos, C. K. (1990). "Infinite-dimensional algebras and a trigonometric basis for the classical Lie algebras". Journal of Mathematical Physics 31 (5): 1088. doi:10.1063/1.528788. Bibcode1990JMP....31.1088F.