Formally smooth map

From HandWiki

In algebraic geometry and commutative algebra, a ring homomorphism f:AB is called formally smooth (from French: Formellement lisse) if it satisfies the following infinitesimal lifting property: Suppose B is given the structure of an A-algebra via the map f. Given a commutative A-algebra, C, and a nilpotent ideal NC, any A-algebra homomorphism BC/N may be lifted to an A-algebra map BC. If moreover any such lifting is unique, then f is said to be formally étale.[1][2]

Formally smooth maps were defined by Alexander Grothendieck in Éléments de géométrie algébrique IV.

For finitely presented morphisms, formal smoothness is equivalent to usual notion of smoothness.

Examples

Smooth morphisms

All smooth morphisms f:XS are equivalent to morphisms locally of finite presentation which are formally smooth. Hence formal smoothness is a slight generalization of smooth morphisms.[3]

Non-example

One method for detecting formal smoothness of a scheme is using infinitesimal lifting criterion. For example, using the truncation morphism

k[ε]/(ε3)k[ε]/(ε2)

the infinitesimal lifting criterion can be described using the commutative square

XSpec(k[ε](ε2))SSpec(k[ε](ε3))

where

X,SSch/S

. For example, if

X=Spec(k[x,y](xy))

and

Y=Spec(k)

then consider the tangent vector at the origin

(0,0)X(k)

given by the ring morphism

k[x,y](xy)k[ε](ε2)

sending

xεyε

Note because

xyε2=0

, this is a valid morphism of commutative rings. Then, since a lifting of this morphism to

Spec(k[ε](ε3))X

is of the form

xε+aε2yε+bε2

and

xyε2+(a+b)ε3=ε2

, there cannot be an infinitesimal lift since this is non-zero, hence

XSch/k

is not formally smooth. This also proves this morphism is not smooth from the equivalence between formally smooth morphisms locally of finite presentation and smooth morphisms.

See also

References