Decimal representation

From HandWiki
Short description: Expression of numbers as sequences of digits


A decimal representation of a non-negative real number r is its expression as a sequence of symbols consisting of decimal digits traditionally written with a single separator: r=bkbk1b0.a1a2 Here . is the decimal separator, k is a nonnegative integer, and b0,,bk,a1,a2, are digits, which are symbols representing integers in the range 0, ..., 9.

Commonly, bk0 if k1. The sequence of the ai—the digits after the dot—is generally infinite. If it is finite, the lacking digits are assumed to be 0. If all ai are 0, the separator is also omitted, resulting in a finite sequence of digits, which represents a natural number.

The decimal representation represents the infinite sum: r=i=0kbi10i+i=1ai10i.

Every nonnegative real number has at least one such representation; it has two such representations (with bk0 if k>0) if and only if one has a trailing infinite sequence of 0, and the other has a trailing infinite sequence of 9. For having a one-to-one correspondence between nonnegative real numbers and decimal representations, decimal representations with a trailing infinite sequence of 9 are sometimes excluded.[1]

Integer and fractional parts

The natural number i=0kbi10i, is called the integer part of r, and is denoted by a0 in the remainder of this article. The sequence of the ai represents the number 0.a1a2=i=1ai10i, which belongs to the interval [0,1), and is called the fractional part of r (except when all ai are 9).

Finite decimal approximations

Any real number can be approximated to any desired degree of accuracy by rational numbers with finite decimal representations.

Assume x0. Then for every integer n1 there is a finite decimal rn=a0.a1a2an such that:

rnx<rn+110n.

Proof: Let rn=p10n, where p=10nx. Then p10nx<p+1, and the result follows from dividing all sides by 10n. (The fact that rn has a finite decimal representation is easily established.)

Non-uniqueness of decimal representation and notational conventions

Main page: 0.999...

Some real numbers x have two infinite decimal representations. For example, the number 1 may be equally represented by 1.000... as by 0.999... (where the infinite sequences of trailing 0's or 9's, respectively, are represented by "..."). Conventionally, the decimal representation without trailing 9's is preferred. Moreover, in the standard decimal representation of x, an infinite sequence of trailing 0's appearing after the decimal point is omitted, along with the decimal point itself if x is an integer.

Certain procedures for constructing the decimal expansion of x will avoid the problem of trailing 9's. For instance, the following algorithmic procedure will give the standard decimal representation: Given x0, we first define a0 (the integer part of x) to be the largest integer such that a0x (i.e., a0=x). If x=a0 the procedure terminates. Otherwise, for (ai)i=0k1 already found, we define ak inductively to be the largest integer such that:

a0+a110+a2102++ak10kx.

 

 

 

 

([[#equation_*|*]])

The procedure terminates whenever ak is found such that equality holds in (*); otherwise, it continues indefinitely to give an infinite sequence of decimal digits. It can be shown that x=supk{i=0kai10i}[2] (conventionally written as x=a0.a1a2a3), where a1,a2,a3{0,1,2,,9}, and the nonnegative integer a0 is represented in decimal notation. This construction is extended to x<0 by applying the above procedure to x>0 and denoting the resultant decimal expansion by a0.a1a2a3.

Types

Finite

The decimal expansion of non-negative real number x will end in zeros (or in nines) if, and only if, x is a rational number whose denominator is of the form 2n5m, where m and n are non-negative integers.

Proof:

If the decimal expansion of x will end in zeros, or x=i=0nai10i=i=0n10niai/10n for some n, then the denominator of x is of the form 10n = 2n5n.

Conversely, if the denominator of x is of the form 2n5m, x=p2n5m=2m5np2n+m5n+m=2m5np10n+m for some p. While x is of the form p10k, p=i=0n10iai for some n. By x=i=0n10niai/10n=i=0nai10i, x will end in zeros.

Infinite

Repeating decimal representations

Main page: Repeating decimal

Some real numbers have decimal expansions that eventually get into loops, endlessly repeating a sequence of one or more digits:

13 = 0.33333...
17 = 0.142857142857...
1318185 = 7.1243243243...

Every time this happens the number is still a rational number (i.e. can alternatively be represented as a ratio of an integer and a positive integer). Also the converse is true: The decimal expansion of a rational number is either finite, or endlessly repeating.

Finite decimal representations can also be seen as a special case of infinite repeating decimal representations. For example, ​3625 = 1.44 = 1.4400000...; the endlessly repeated sequence is the one-digit sequence "0".

Non-repeating decimal representations

Other real numbers have decimal expansions that never repeat. These are precisely the irrational numbers, numbers that cannot be represented as a ratio of integers. Some well-known examples are:

2 = 1.41421356237309504880...
  e  = 2.71828182845904523536...
  π  = 3.14159265358979323846...

Conversion to fraction

Every decimal representation of a rational number can be converted to a fraction by converting it into a sum of the integer, non-repeating, and repeating parts and then converting that sum to a single fraction with a common denominator.

For example to convert ±8.1234567 to a fraction one notes the lemma: 0.0004567=4567×0.0000001=4567×0.0001×1103=4567×19999×1103=45679999×1103=4567(1041)×103The exponents are the number of non-repeating digits after the decimal point (3) and the number of repeating digits (4).

Thus one converts as follows: ±8.1234567=±(8+123103+4567(1041)×103)from above=±8×(1041)×103+123×(1041)+4567(1041)×103common denominator=±812264449999000multiplying, and summing the numerator=±203066112499750reducing

If there are no repeating digits one assumes that there is a forever repeating 0, e.g. 1.9=1.90, although since that makes the repeating term zero the sum simplifies to two terms and a simpler conversion.

For example: ±8.1234=±(8+1234104)=±8×104+1234104common denominator=±8123410000multiplying, and summing the numerator=±406175000reducing

See also

References

  1. The Art of Computer Programming. 1: Fundamental Algorithms. Addison-Wesley. 1973. pp. 21. 
  2. Principles of Mathematical Analysis. New York: McGraw-Hill. 1976. pp. 11. ISBN 0-07-054235-X. 

Further reading

br:Dispakadur dekredel ckb:نواندنی دەدەیی