Corners theorem

From HandWiki

In arithmetic combinatorics, the corners theorem states that for every ε>0, for large enough N, any set of at least εN2 points in the N×N grid {1,,N}2 contains a corner, i.e., a triple of points of the form {(x,y),(x+h,y),(x,y+h)} with h0. It was first proved by Miklós Ajtai and Endre Szemerédi in 1974 using Szemerédi's theorem.[1] In 2003, József Solymosi gave a short proof using the triangle removal lemma.[2]

Statement

Define a corner to be a subset of 2 of the form {(x,y),(x+h,y),(x,y+h)}, where x,y,h and h0. For every ε>0, there exists a positive integer N(ε) such that for any NN(ε), any subset A{1,,N}2 with size at least εN2 contains a corner.

The condition h0 can be relaxed to h>0 by showing that if A is dense, then it has some dense subset that is centrally symmetric.

Proof overview

What follows is a sketch of Solymosi's argument.

Suppose A{1,,N}2 is corner-free. Construct an auxiliary tripartite graph G with parts X={x1,,xN}, Y={y1,,yN}, and Z={z1,,z2N}, where xi corresponds to the line x=i, yj corresponds to the line y=j, and zk corresponds to the line x+y=k. Connect two vertices if the intersection of their corresponding lines lies in A.

Note that a triangle in G corresponds to a corner in A, except in the trivial case where the lines corresponding to the vertices of the triangle concur at a point in A. It follows that every edge of G is in exactly one triangle, so by the triangle removal lemma, G has o(|V(G)|2) edges, so |A|=o(N2), as desired.

Quantitative bounds

Let r(N) be the size of the largest subset of [N]2 which contains no corner. The best known bounds are

N22(c1+o(1))log2Nr(N)N2(loglogN)c2,

where c11.822 and c20.0137. The lower bound is due to Green,[3] building on the work of Linial and Shraibman.[4] The upper bound is due to Shkredov.[5]

Multidimensional extension

A corner in d is a set of points of the form {a}{a+hei:1id}, where e1,,ed is the standard basis of d, and h0. The natural extension of the corners theorem to this setting can be shown using the hypergraph removal lemma, in the spirit of Solymosi's proof. The hypergraph removal lemma was shown independently by Gowers[6] and Nagle, Rödl, Schacht and Skokan.[7]

Multidimensional Szemerédi's Theorem

The multidimensional Szemerédi theorem states that for any fixed finite subset Sd, and for every ε>0, there exists a positive integer N(S,ε) such that for any NN(S,ε), any subset A{1,,N}d with size at least εNd contains a subset of the form aS+h. This theorem follows from the multidimensional corners theorem by a simple projection argument.[6] In particular, Roth's theorem on arithmetic progressions follows directly from the ordinary corners theorem.

References

  1. Ajtai, Miklós; Szemerédi, Endre (1974). "Sets of lattice points that form no squares". Stud. Sci. Math. Hungar. 9: 9–11. .
  2. Solymosi, József (2003). "Note on a generalization of Roth's theorem". in Aronov, Boris; Basu, Saugata; Pach, János et al.. Discrete and computational geometry. Algorithms and Combinatorics. 25. Berlin: Springer-Verlag. pp. 825–827. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-55566-4_39. ISBN 3-540-00371-1. 
  3. Green, Ben (2021). "Lower Bounds for Corner-Free Sets". New Zealand Journal of Mathematics 51. doi:10.53733/86. 
  4. Linial, Nati; Shraibman, Adi (2021). "Larger Corner-Free Sets from Better NOF Exactly-N Protocols". Discrete Analysis 2021. doi:10.19086/da.28933. 
  5. Shkredov, I.D. (2006). "On a Generalization of Szemerédi's Theorem". Proceedings of the London Mathematical Society 93 (3): 723–760. doi:10.1017/S0024611506015991. 
  6. 6.0 6.1 Gowers, Timothy (2007). "Hypergraph regularity and the multidimensional Szemerédi theorem". Annals of Mathematics 166 (3): 897–946. doi:10.4007/annals.2007.166.897. 
  7. Rodl, V.; Nagle, B.; Skokan, J.; Schacht, M.; Kohayakawa, Y. (2005-05-26). "From The Cover: The hypergraph regularity method and its applications". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 102 (23): 8109–8113. doi:10.1073/pnas.0502771102. ISSN 0027-8424. PMID 15919821. Bibcode2005PNAS..102.8109R.