Convex analysis

From HandWiki
A 3-dimensional convex polytope. Convex analysis includes not only the study of convex subsets of Euclidean spaces but also the study of convex functions on abstract spaces.

Convex analysis is the branch of mathematics devoted to the study of properties of convex functions and convex sets, often with applications in convex minimization, a subdomain of optimization theory.

Convex sets

Main page: Convex set

A subset CX of some vector space X is convex if it satisfies any of the following equivalent conditions:

  1. If 0r1 is real and x,yC then rx+(1r)yC.[1]
  2. If 0<r<1 is real and x,yC with xy, then rx+(1r)yC.
Convex function on an interval.
Main page: Convex function

Throughout, f:X[,] will be a map valued in the extended real numbers [,]={±} with a domain domainf=X that is a convex subset of some vector space. The map f:X[,] is a convex function if

f(rx+(1r)y)rf(x)+(1r)f(y)

 

 

 

 

(Convexity ≤)

holds for any real 0<r<1 and any x,yX with xy. If this remains true of f when the defining inequality (Convexity ≤) is replaced by the strict inequality

f(rx+(1r)y)<rf(x)+(1r)f(y)

 

 

 

 

(Convexity <)

then f is called strictly convex.[1]

Convex functions are related to convex sets. Specifically, the function f is convex if and only if its epigraph

A function (in black) is convex if and only if its epigraph, which is the region above its graph (in green), is a convex set.
A graph of the bivariate convex function x2+xy+y2.

epif:={(x,r)X×:f(x)r}

 

 

 

 

(Epigraph def.)

is a convex set.[2] The epigraphs of extended real-valued functions play a role in convex analysis that is analogous to the role played by graphs of real-valued function in real analysis. Specifically, the epigraph of an extended real-valued function provides geometric intuition that can be used to help formula or prove conjectures.

The domain of a function f:X[,] is denoted by domainf while its effective domain is the set[2]

domf:={xX:f(x)<}.

 

 

 

 

(dom f def.)

The function f:X[,] is called proper if domf and f(x)> for all xdomainf.[2] Alternatively, this means that there exists some x in the domain of f at which f(x) and f is also never equal to . In words, a function is proper if its domain is not empty, it never takes on the value , and it also is not identically equal to +. If f:n[,] is a proper convex function then there exist some vector bn and some r such that

f(x)xbr     for every x

where xb denotes the dot product of these vectors.

Convex conjugate

Main page: Convex conjugate

The convex conjugate of an extended real-valued function f:X[,] (not necessarily convex) is the function f*:X*[,] from the (continuous) dual space X* of X, and[3]

f*(x*)=supzX{x*,zf(z)}

where the brackets , denote the canonical duality x*,z:=x*(z). The biconjugate of f is the map f**=(f*)*:X[,] defined by f**(x):=supz*X*{x,z*f(z*)} for every xX. If Func(X;Y) denotes the set of Y-valued functions on X, then the map Func(X;[,])Func(X*;[,]) defined by ff* is called the Legendre-Fenchel transform.

Subdifferential set and the Fenchel-Young inequality

If f:X[,] and xX then the subdifferential set is

f(x):={x*X*:f(z)f(x)+x*,zx for all zX}(zX'' can be replaced with: zX such that zx'')={x*X*:x*,xf(x)x*,zf(z) for all zX}={x*X*:x*,xf(x)supzXx*,zf(z)} The right hand side is f*(x*)={x*X*:x*,xf(x)=f*(x*)} Taking z:=x in the sup gives the inequality .

For example, in the important special case where f= is a norm on X, it can be shown[proof 1] that if 0xX then this definition reduces down to:

f(x)={x*X*:x*,x=x and x*=1}     and     f(0)={x*X*:x*1}.

For any xX and x*X*, f(x)+f*(x*)x*,x, which is called the Fenchel-Young inequality. This inequality is an equality (i.e. f(x)+f*(x*)=x*,x) if and only if x*f(x). It is in this way that the subdifferential set f(x) is directly related to the convex conjugate f*(x*).

Biconjugate

The biconjugate of a function f:X[,] is the conjugate of the conjugate, typically written as f**:X[,]. The biconjugate is useful for showing when strong or weak duality hold (via the perturbation function).

For any xX, the inequality f**(x)f(x) follows from the Fenchel–Young inequality. For proper functions, f=f** if and only if f is convex and lower semi-continuous by Fenchel–Moreau theorem.[3][4]

Convex minimization

Main page: Convex optimization

A convex minimization (primal) problem is one of the form

find infxMf(x) when given a convex function f:X[,] and a convex subset MX.

Dual problem

Main page: Duality (optimization)

In optimization theory, the duality principle states that optimization problems may be viewed from either of two perspectives, the primal problem or the dual problem.

In general given two dual pairs separated locally convex spaces (X,X*) and (Y,Y*). Then given the function f:X[,], we can define the primal problem as finding x such that

infxXf(x).

If there are constraint conditions, these can be built into the function f by letting f=f+Iconstraints where I is the indicator function. Then let F:X×Y[,] be a perturbation function such that F(x,0)=f(x).[5]

The dual problem with respect to the chosen perturbation function is given by

supy*Y*F*(0,y*)

where F* is the convex conjugate in both variables of F.

The duality gap is the difference of the right and left hand sides of the inequality[6][5][7]

supy*Y*F*(0,y*)infxXF(x,0).

This principle is the same as weak duality. If the two sides are equal to each other, then the problem is said to satisfy strong duality.

There are many conditions for strong duality to hold such as:

Lagrange duality

For a convex minimization problem with inequality constraints,

minxf(x) subject to gi(x)0 for i=1,,m.

the Lagrangian dual problem is

supuinfxL(x,u) subject to ui(x)0 for i=1,,m.

where the objective function L(x,u) is the Lagrange dual function defined as follows:

L(x,u)=f(x)+j=1mujgj(x)

See also

Notes

  1. 1.0 1.1 Rockafellar, R. Tyrrell (1997). Convex Analysis. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. ISBN 978-0-691-01586-6. 
  2. 2.0 2.1 2.2 Rockafellar & Wets 2009, pp. 1-28.
  3. 3.0 3.1 Zălinescu 2002, pp. 75-79.
  4. Borwein, Jonathan; Lewis, Adrian (2006). Convex Analysis and Nonlinear Optimization: Theory and Examples (2 ed.). Springer. pp. 76–77. ISBN 978-0-387-29570-1. https://archive.org/details/convexanalysisno00borw_812. 
  5. 5.0 5.1 Boţ, Radu Ioan; Wanka, Gert; Grad, Sorin-Mihai (2009). Duality in Vector Optimization. Springer. ISBN 978-3-642-02885-4. 
  6. Zălinescu 2002, pp. 106-113.
  7. Csetnek, Ernö Robert (2010). Overcoming the failure of the classical generalized interior-point regularity conditions in convex optimization. Applications of the duality theory to enlargements of maximal monotone operators. Logos Verlag Berlin GmbH. ISBN 978-3-8325-2503-3. 
  8. Borwein, Jonathan; Lewis, Adrian (2006). Convex Analysis and Nonlinear Optimization: Theory and Examples (2 ed.). Springer. ISBN 978-0-387-29570-1. 
  9. Boyd, Stephen; Vandenberghe, Lieven (2004). Convex Optimization. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-521-83378-3. https://web.stanford.edu/~boyd/cvxbook/bv_cvxbook.pdf. Retrieved October 3, 2011. 
  1. The conclusion is immediate if X={0} so assume otherwise. Fix xX. Replacing f with the norm gives f(x)={x*X*:x*,xxx*,zz for all zX}. If x*f(x) and r0 is real then using z:=rx gives x*,xxx*,rxrx=r[x*,xx], where in particular, taking r:=2 gives x*(x)x while taking r:=12 gives x*(x)x and thus x*(x)=x; moreover, if in addition x0 then because x*(xx)=1, it follows from the definition of the dual norm that x*1. Because f(x){x*X*:x*(x)=x}, which is equivalent to f(x)=f(x){x*X*:x*(x)=x}, it follows that f(x)={x*X*:x*(x)=x and zx*,z for all zX}, which implies x*1 for all x*f(x). From these facts, the conclusion can now be reached. ∎

References