Grassmannian

From HandWiki
Revision as of 19:33, 6 February 2024 by imported>WikiGary (add)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Short description: Mathematical space


In mathematics, the Grassmannian 𝐆𝐫k(V) (named in honour of Hermann Grassmann) is a differentiable manifold that parameterizes the set of all k-dimensional linear subspaces of an n-dimensional vector space V over a field K. For example, the Grassmannian 𝐆𝐫1(V) is the space of lines through the origin in V, so it is the same as the projective space 𝐏(V) of one dimension lower than V.[1][2] When V is a real or complex vector space, Grassmannians are compact smooth manifolds , of dimension k(nk).[3] In general they have the structure of a nonsingular projective algebraic variety.

The earliest work on a non-trivial Grassmannian is due to Julius Plücker, who studied the set of projective lines in real projective 3-space, which is equivalent to 𝐆𝐫2(𝐑4), parameterizing them by what are now called Plücker coordinates. (See § Plücker coordinates and Plücker relations below.) Hermann Grassmann later introduced the concept in general.

Notations for Grassmannians vary between authors, and include 𝐆𝐫k(V), 𝐆𝐫(k,V),𝐆𝐫k(n), 𝐆𝐫(k,n) to denote the Grassmannian of k-dimensional subspaces of an n-dimensional vector space V.

Motivation

By giving a collection of subspaces of a vector space a topological structure, it is possible to talk about a continuous choice of subspaces or open and closed collections of subspaces. Giving them the further structure of a differential manifold, one can talk about smooth choices of subspace.

A natural example comes from tangent bundles of smooth manifolds embedded in a Euclidean space. Suppose we have a manifold M of dimension k embedded in 𝐑n. At each point xM, the tangent space to M can be considered as a subspace of the tangent space of 𝐑n, which is also just 𝐑n. The map assigning to x its tangent space defines a map from M to 𝐆𝐫k(𝐑n). (In order to do this, we have to translate the tangent space at each xM so that it passes through the origin rather than x, and hence defines a k-dimensional vector subspace. This idea is very similar to the Gauss map for surfaces in a 3-dimensional space.)

This can with some effort be extended to all vector bundles over a manifold M, so that every vector bundle generates a continuous map from M to a suitably generalised Grassmannian—although various embedding theorems must be proved to show this. We then find that the properties of our vector bundles are related to the properties of the corresponding maps. In particular we find that vector bundles inducing homotopic maps to the Grassmannian are isomorphic. Here the definition of homotopy relies on a notion of continuity, and hence a topology.

Low dimensions

For k = 1, the Grassmannian Gr(1, n) is the space of lines through the origin in n-space, so it is the same as the projective space 𝐏n1of n āˆ’ 1 dimensions.

For k = 2, the Grassmannian is the space of all 2-dimensional planes containing the origin. In Euclidean 3-space, a plane containing the origin is completely characterized by the one and only line through the origin that is perpendicular to that plane (and vice versa); hence the spaces Gr(2, 3), Gr(1, 3), and P2 (the projective plane) may all be identified with each other.

The simplest Grassmannian that is not a projective space is Gr(2, 4).

The Grassmannian as a differentiable manifold

To endow 𝐆𝐫k(V) with the structure of a differentiable manifold, choose a basis for V. This is equivalent to identifying V with Kn, with the standard basis denoted (e1,,en), viewed as column vectors. Then for any k-dimensional subspace wV, viewed as an element of 𝐆𝐫k(V), we may choose a basis consisting of k linearly independent column vectors (W1,,Wk). The homogeneous coordinates of the element w𝐆𝐫k(V) consist of the elements of the n×k maximal rank rectangular matrix W whose i-th column vector is Wi, i=1,,k. Since the choice of basis is arbitrary, two such maximal rank rectangular matrices W and W~ represent the same element w𝐆𝐫k(V) if and only if

W~=Wg

for some element gGL(k,K) of the general linear group of invertible k×k matrices with entries in K. This defines an equivalence relation between n×k matrices W of rank k, for which the equivalence classes are denoted [W].

We now define a coordinate atlas. For any n×k homogeneous coordinate matrix W, we can apply elementary column operations (which amounts to multiplying W by a sequence of elements gGL(k,K)) to obtain its reduced column echelon form. If the first k rows of W are linearly independent, the result will have the form

[111a1,1a1,kank,1ank,k]

and the (nk)×k affine coordinate matrix A with entries (aij) determines w. In general, the first k rows need not be independent, but since W has maximal rank k, there exists an ordered set of integers 1i1<<ikn such that the k×k submatrix Wi1,,ik whose rows are the (i1,,ik)-th rows of W is nonsingular. We may apply column operations to reduce this submatrix to the identity matrix, and the remaining entries uniquely determine w. Hence we have the following definition:

For each ordered set of integers 1i1<<ikn, let Ui1,,ik be the set of elements w𝐆𝐫k(V) for which, for any choice of homogeneous coordinate matrix W, the k×k submatrix Wi1,,ik whose j-th row is the ij-th row of W is nonsingular. The affine coordinate functions on Ui1,,ik are then defined as the entries of the (nk)×k matrix Ai1,,ik whose rows are those of the matrix WWi1,,ik1 complementary to (i1,,ik), written in the same order. The choice of homogeneous n×k coordinate matrix W in [W] representing the element w𝐆𝐫k(V) does not affect the values of the affine coordinate matrix Ai1,,ik representing w on the coordinate neighbourhood Ui1,,ik. Moreover, the coordinate matrices Ai1,,ik may take arbitrary values, and they define a diffeomorphism from Ui1,,ik to the space of K-valued (nk)×k matrices. Denote by

A^i1,,ik:=W(Wi1,,ik)1

the homogeneous coordinate matrix having the identity matrix as the k×k submatrix with rows (i1,,ik) and the affine coordinate matrix Ai1,,ik in the consecutive complementary rows. On the overlap Ui1,,ikUj1,,jk between any two such coordinate neighborhoods, the affine coordinate matrix values Ai1,,ik and Aj1,,jk are related by the transition relations

A^i1,,ikWi1,,ik=A^j1,,jkWj1,,jk,

where both Wi1,,ik and Wj1,,jk are invertible. This may equivalently be written as

A^j1,,jk=A^i1,,ik(A^j1,,jki1,,ik)1,

where A^j1,,jki1,,ik is the invertible k×k matrix whose lth row is the jlth row of A^i1,,ik. The transition functions are therefore rational in the matrix elements of Ai1,,ik, and {Ui1,,ik,Ai1,,ik} gives an atlas for 𝐆𝐫k(V) as a differentiable manifold and also as an algebraic variety.

The Grassmannian as a set of orthogonal projections

An alternative way to define a real or complex Grassmannian as a manifold is to view it as a set of orthogonal projection operators ((Milnor Stasheff) problem 5-C). For this, choose a positive definite real or Hermitian inner product , on V, depending on whether V is real or complex. A k-dimensional subspace w determines a unique orthogonal projection operator Pw:VV whose image is wV by splitting V into the orthogonal direct sum

V=ww

of w and its orthogonal complement w and defining

Pw(v)={v if vw0 if vw.

Conversely, every projection operator P of rank k defines a subspace wP:=Im(P) as its image. Since the rank of an orthogonal projection operator equals its trace, we can identify the Grassmann manifold 𝐆𝐫(k,V) with the set of rank k orthogonal projection operators P:

𝐆𝐫(k,V){PEnd(V)P=P2=P,tr(P)=k}.

In particular, taking V=𝐑n or V=𝐂n this gives completely explicit equations for embedding the Grassmannians 𝐆𝐫(k,𝐑N), 𝐆𝐫(k,𝐂N) in the space of real or complex n×n matrices 𝐑n×n, 𝐂n×n, respectively.

Since this defines the Grassmannian as a closed subset of the sphere {XEnd(V)tr(XX)=k} this is one way to see that the Grassmannian is a compact Hausdorff space. This construction also turns the Grassmannian 𝐆𝐫(k,V) into a metric space with metric

d(w,w):=PwPw,

for any pair w,wV of k-dimensional subspaces, where ||ā‹…|| denotes the operator norm. The exact inner product used does not matter, because a different inner product will give an equivalent norm on V, and hence an equivalent metric.

For the case of real or complex Grassmannians, the following is an equivalent way to express the above construction in terms of matrices.

Grassmannians 𝐆𝐫(k,𝐑n), 𝐆𝐫(k,𝐂n) as affine algebraic varieties

Let M(n,𝐑) denote the space of real n×n matrices and the subset P(k,n,𝐑)M(n,𝐑) of matrices PM(n,𝐑) that satisfy the three conditions:

  • P is a projection operator: P2=P.
  • P is symmetric: PT=P.
  • P has trace tr(P)=k.

There is a bijective correspondence between P(k,n,𝐑) and the Grassmannian 𝐆𝐫(k,𝐑n) of k-dimensional subspaces of 𝐑n given by sending PP(k,n,𝐑) to the k-dimensional subspace of 𝐑n spanned by its columns and, conversely, sending any element w𝐆𝐫(k,𝐑n) to the projection matrix

Pw:=i=1kwiwiT,

where (w1,,wk) is any orthonormal basis for w𝐑n, viewed as real n component column vectors.

An analogous construction applies to the complex Grassmannian 𝐆𝐫(k,𝐂n), identifying it bijectively with the subset P(k,n,𝐂)M(n,𝐂) of complex n×n matrices PM(n,𝐂) satisfying

  • P is a projection operator: P2=P.
  • P is self-adjoint (Hermitian): P=P.
  • P has trace tr(P)=k,

where the self-adjointness is with respect to the Hermitian inner product , in which the standard basis vectors (e1,,en) are orthonomal. The formula for the orthogonal projection matrix Pw onto the complex k-dimensional subspace w𝐂n spanned by the orthonormal (unitary) basis vectors (w1,,wk) is

Pw:=i=1kwiwi.

The Grassmannian as a homogeneous space

The quickest way of giving the Grassmannian a geometric structure is to express it as a homogeneous space. First, recall that the general linear group GL(V) acts transitively on the k-dimensional subspaces of V. Therefore, if we choose a subspace w0V of dimension k, any element w𝐆𝐫(k,V) can be expressed as

w=g(w0)

for some group element gGL(V), where g is determined only up to right multiplication by elements {hH} of the stabilizer of w0:

H:=stab(w0):={hGL(V)|h(w0)=w0}GL(V)

under the GL(V)-action.

We may therefore identify 𝐆𝐫(k,V) with the quotient space

𝐆𝐫(k,V)=GL(V)/H

of left cosets of H.

If the underlying field is 𝐑 or 𝐂 and GL(V) is considered as a Lie group, this construction makes the Grassmannian a smooth manifold under the quotient structure. More generally, over a ground field K, the group GL(V) is an algebraic group, and this construction shows that the Grassmannian is a non-singular algebraic variety. It follows from the existence of the Plücker embedding that the Grassmannian is complete as an algebraic variety. In particular, H is a parabolic subgroup of GL(V).

Over 𝐑 or 𝐂 it also becomes possible to use smaller groups in this construction. To do this over 𝐑, fix a Euclidean inner product q on V. The real orthogonal group O(V,q) acts transitively on the set of k-dimensional subspaces 𝐆𝐫(k,V) and the stabiliser of a k-space w0V is

O(w0,q|w0)×O(w0,q|w0),

where w0 is the orthogonal complement of w0 in V. This gives an identification as the homogeneous space

𝐆𝐫(k,V)=O(V,q)/(O(w,q|w)×O(w,q|w)).

If we take V=𝐑n and w0=𝐑k𝐑n (the first k components) we get the isomorphism

𝐆𝐫(k,𝐑n)=O(n)/(O(k)×O(nk)).

Over C, if we choose an Hermitian inner product h, the unitary group U(V,h) acts transitively, and we find analogously

𝐆𝐫(k,V)=U(V,h)/(U(w0,h|w0)×U(w0|,hw0)),

or, for V=𝐂n and w0=𝐂k𝐂n,

𝐆𝐫(k,𝐂n)=U(n)/(U(k)×U(nk)).

In particular, this shows that the Grassmannian is compact, and of (real or complex) dimension k(n āˆ’ k).

The Grassmannian as a scheme

In the realm of algebraic geometry, the Grassmannian can be constructed as a scheme by expressing it as a representable functor.[4]

Representable functor

Let be a quasi-coherent sheaf on a scheme S. Fix a positive integer k. Then to each S-scheme T, the Grassmannian functor associates the set of quotient modules of

T:=OSOT

locally free of rank k on T. We denote this set by 𝐆𝐫(k,T).

This functor is representable by a separated S-scheme 𝐆𝐫(k,). The latter is projective if is finitely generated. When S is the spectrum of a field K, then the sheaf is given by a vector space V and we recover the usual Grassmannian variety of the dual space of V, namely: 𝐆𝐫(k,V). By construction, the Grassmannian scheme is compatible with base changes: for any S-scheme S, we have a canonical isomorphism

𝐆𝐫(k,)×SS𝐆𝐫(k,S)

In particular, for any point s of S, the canonical morphism {s}=SpecK(s)S induces an isomorphism from the fiber 𝐆𝐫(k,)s to the usual Grassmannian 𝐆𝐫(k,OSK(s)) over the residue field K(s).

Universal family

Since the Grassmannian scheme represents a functor, it comes with a universal object, 𝒢, which is an object of 𝐆𝐫(k,𝐆𝐫(k,)), and therefore a quotient module 𝒢 of 𝐆𝐫(k,), locally free of rank k over 𝐆𝐫(k,). The quotient homomorphism induces a closed immersion from the projective bundle:

𝐏(𝒢)𝐏(𝐆𝐫(k,))=𝐏()×S𝐆𝐫(k,).

For any morphism of S-schemes:

T𝐆𝐫(k,),

this closed immersion induces a closed immersion

𝐏(𝒢T)𝐏()×ST.

Conversely, any such closed immersion comes from a surjective homomorphism of OT-modules from T to a locally free module of rank k.[5] Therefore, the elements of 𝐆𝐫(k,)(T) are exactly the projective subbundles of rank k in 𝐏()×ST.

Under this identification, when T=S is the spectrum of a field K and is given by a vector space V, the set of rational points 𝐆𝐫(k,)(K) correspond to the projective linear subspaces of dimension k1 in 𝐏(V), and the image of 𝐏(𝒢)(K) in

𝐏(V)×K𝐆𝐫(k,)

is the set

{(x,v)𝐏(V)(K)×𝐆𝐫(k,)(K)xv}.

The Plücker embedding

The Plücker embedding[6] is a natural embedding of the Grassmannian 𝐆𝐫(k,V) into the projectivization of the kth Exterior power ΛkV of V.

ι:𝐆𝐫(k,V)𝐏(ΛkV).

Suppose that wV is a k-dimensional subspace of the n-dimensional vector space V. To define ι(w), choose a basis (w1,,wk) for w, and let ι(w) be the projectivization of the wedge product of these basis elements: ι(w)=[w1wk], where [] denotes the projective equivalence class.

A different basis for w will give a different wedge product, but the two will differ only by a non-zero scalar multiple (the determinant of the change of basis matrix). Since the right-hand side takes values in the projectivized space, ι is well-defined. To see that it is an embedding, notice that it is possible to recover w from ι(w) as the span of the set of all vectors vV such that

vι(w)=0.

Plücker coordinates and Plücker relations

The Plücker embedding of the Grassmannian satisfies a set of simple quadratic relations called the Plücker relations. These show that the Grassmannian 𝐆𝐫k(V) embeds as a nonsingular projective algebraic subvariety of the projectivization 𝐏(ΛkV) of the kth exterior power of V and give another method for constructing the Grassmannian. To state the Plücker relations, fix a basis (e1,,en) for V, and let wV be a k-dimensional subspace of V with basis (w1,,wk). Let (wi1,,win) be the components of wi with respect to the chosen basis of V, and (W1,,Wn) the k-component column vectors forming the transpose of the corresponding homogeneous coordinate matrix:

WT=[W1Wn]=[w11w1nwk1wkn],

For any ordered sequence 1i1<<ikn of k positive integers, let wi1,,ik be the determinant of the k×k matrix with columns [Wi1,,Wik]. The elements {wi1,,ik|1i1<<ikn} are called the Plücker coordinates of the element w𝐆𝐫k(V) of the Grassmannian (with respect to the basis (e1,,en) of V). These are the linear coordinates of the image ι(w) of w under the Plücker map, relative to the basis of the exterior power ΛkV space generated by the basis (e1,,en) of V. Since a change of basis for w gives rise to multiplication of the Plücker coordinates by a nonzero constant (the determinant of the change of basis matrix), these are only defined up to projective equivalence, and hence determine a point in 𝐏(ΛkV).

For any two ordered sequences 1i1<i2<ik1n and 1j1<j2<jk+1n of k1 and k+1 positive integers, respectively, the following homogeneous quadratic equations, known as the Plücker relations, or the Plücker-Grassmann relations, are valid and determine the image ι(𝐆𝐫k(V)) of 𝐆𝐫k(V) under the Plücker map embedding:

l=1k+1(1)wi1,,ik1,jlwj1,,jl^,jk+1=0,

where j1,,jl^,jk+1 denotes the sequence j1,,jk+1 with the term jl omitted. These are consistent, determining a nonsingular projective algebraic variety, but they are not algebraically independent. They are equivalent to the statement that ι(w) is the projectivization of a completely decomposable element of ΛkV.

When dim(V)=4, and k=2 (the simplest Grassmannian that is not a projective space), the above reduces to a single equation. Denoting the homogeneous coordinates of the image ι(𝐆𝐫2(V)𝐏(Λ2V) under the Plücker map as (w12,w13,w14,w23,w24,w34), this single Plücker relation is

w12w34w13w24+w14w23=0.

In general, many more equations are needed to define the image ι(𝐆𝐫k(V)) of the Grassmannian in 𝐏(ΛkV) under the Plücker embedding.

Duality

Every k-dimensional subspace WV determines an (nk)-dimensional quotient space V/W of V. This gives the natural short exact sequence:

0WVV/W0.

Taking the dual to each of these three spaces and the dual linear transformations yields an inclusion of (V/W)* in V* with quotient W*

0(V/W)*V*W*0.

Using the natural isomorphism of a finite-dimensional vector space with its double dual shows that taking the dual again recovers the original short exact sequence. Consequently there is a one-to-one correspondence between k-dimensional subspaces of V and (nk)-dimensional subspaces of V*. In terms of the Grassmannian, this gives a canonical isomorphism

𝐆𝐫k(V)𝐆𝐫(nk,V*)

that associates to each subspace WV its annihilator W0V*. Choosing an isomorphism of V with V* therefore determines a (non-canonical) isomorphism between 𝐆𝐫k(V) and 𝐆𝐫nk(V). An isomorphism of V with V* is equivalent to the choice of an inner product, so with respect to the chosen inner product, this isomorphism of Grassmannians sends any k-dimensional subspace into its (nk)}-dimensional orthogonal complement.

Schubert cells

The detailed study of Grassmannians makes use of a decomposition into affine subpaces called Schubert cells, which were first applied in enumerative geometry. The Schubert cells for 𝐆𝐫k(V) are defined in terms of a specified complete flag of subspaces V1V2Vn=V of dimension dim(Vi)=i. For any partition

λ=(λ1,,λk)

of weight

|λ|=i=1kλi

consisting of weakly decreasing non-negative integers

λ1λk0,

whose Young diagram fits within the rectangular one (nk)k, the Schubert cell Xλ(k,n)𝐆𝐫k(V) consists of those elements W𝐆𝐫k(V) whose intersections with the subspaces {Vi} have the following dimensions

Xλ(k,n)={W𝐆𝐫k(V)|dim(WVnk+jλj)=j}.

These are affine spaces, and their closures (within the Zariski topology) are known as Schubert varieties.

As an example of the technique, consider the problem of determining the Euler characteristic χk,n of the Grassmannian 𝐆𝐫k(𝐑n) of k-dimensional subspaces of Rn. Fix a 1-dimensional subspace 𝐑𝐑n and consider the partition of 𝐆𝐫k(𝐑n) into those k-dimensional subspaces of Rn that contain R and those that do not. The former is 𝐆𝐫k1(𝐑n1) and the latter is a rank k vector bundle over 𝐆𝐫k(𝐑n1). This gives recursive formulae:

χk,n=χk1,n1+(1)kχk,n1,χ0,n=χn,n=1.

Solving these recursion relations gives the formula: χk,n=0 if n is even and k is odd and

χk,n=(n2k2)

otherwise.

Cohomology ring of the complex Grassmannian

Every point in the complex Grassmann manifold 𝐆𝐫k(𝐂n) defines a k-plane in n-space. Fibering these planes over the Grassmannian one arrives at the vector bundle E which generalizes the tautological bundle of a projective space. Similarly the (nk)-dimensional orthogonal complements of these planes yield an orthogonal vector bundle F. The integral cohomology of the Grassmannians is generated, as a ring, by the Chern classes of E. In particular, all of the integral cohomology is at even degree as in the case of a projective space.

These generators are subject to a set of relations, which defines the ring. The defining relations are easy to express for a larger set of generators, which consists of the Chern classes of E and F. Then the relations merely state that the direct sum of the bundles E and F is trivial. Functoriality of the total Chern classes allows one to write this relation as

c(E)c(F)=1.

The quantum cohomology ring was calculated by Edward Witten.[7] The generators are identical to those of the classical cohomology ring, but the top relation is changed to

ck(E)cnk(F)=(1)nk

reflecting the existence in the corresponding quantum field theory of an instanton with 2n fermionic zero-modes which violates the degree of the cohomology corresponding to a state by 2n units.

Associated measure

When V is an n-dimensional Euclidean space, we may define a uniform measure on 𝐆𝐫k(V) in the following way. Let θn be the unit Haar measure on the orthogonal group O(n) and fix w𝐆𝐫k(V). Then for a set A𝐆𝐫k(V) , define

γk,n(A)=θn{gO(n):gwA}.

This measure is invariant under the action of the group O(n); that is,

γk,n(gA)=γk,n(A)

for all gO(n). Since θn(O(n))=1, we have γk,n(𝐆𝐫k(V))=1. Moreover, γk,n is a Radon measure with respect to the metric space topology and is uniform in the sense that every ball of the same radius (with respect to this metric) is of the same measure.

Oriented Grassmannian

This is the manifold consisting of all oriented k-dimensional subspaces of 𝐑n. It is a double cover of 𝐆𝐫k(𝐑n) and is denoted by 𝐆𝐫~k(𝐑n).

As a homogeneous space it can be expressed as:

𝐆𝐫~k(𝐑n)=SO(n)/(SO(k)×SO(nk)).

Orthogonal isotropic Grassmannians

Given a real or complex nondegenerate symmetric bilinear form Q on the n-dimensional space V (i.e., a scalar product), the totally isotropic Grassmannian 𝐆𝐫k0(V,Q) is defined as the subvariety 𝐆𝐫k0(V,Q)𝐆𝐫k(V) consisting of all k-dimensional subspaces wV for which

Q(u,v)=0,u,vw.

Maximal isotropic Grassmannians with respect to a real or complex scalar product are closely related to Cartan's theory of spinors.[8] Under the Cartan embedding, their connected components are equivariantly diffeomorphic to the projectivized minimal spinor orbit, under the spin representation, the so-called projective pure spinor variety which, similarly to the image of the Plücker map embedding, is cut out as the intersection of a number of quadrics, the Cartan quadrics.[8][9][10]

Applications

A key application of Grassmannians is as the "universal" embedding space for bundles with connections on compact manifolds.[11][12]

Another important application is Schubert calculus, which is the enumerative geometry involved in calculating the number of points, lines, planes, etc. in a projective space that intersect a given set of points, lines, etc., using the intersection theory of Schubert varieties. Subvarieties of Schubert cells can also be used to parametrize simultaneous eigenvectors of complete sets of commuting operators in quantum integrable spin systems, such as the Gaudin model, using the Bethe ansatz method.[13]

A further application is to the solution of hierarchies of classical completely integrable systems of partial differential equations, such as the Kadomtsev–Petviashvili equation and the associated KP hierarchy. These can be expressed in terms of abelian group flows on an infinite-dimensional Grassmann manifold.[14][15][16][17] The KP equations, expressed in Hirota bilinear form in terms of the KP Tau function are equivalent to the Plücker relations.[18][17] A similar construction holds for solutions of the BKP integrable hierarchy, in terms of abelian group flows on an infinite dimensional maximal isotropic Grassmann manifold.[15][16][19]

Finite dimensional positive Grassmann manifolds can be used to express soliton solutions of KP equations which are nonsingular for real values of the KP flow parameters.[20][21][22]

The scattering amplitudes of subatomic particles in maximally supersymmetric super Yang-Mills theory may be calculated in the planar limit via a positive Grassmannian construct called the amplituhedron.[23]

Grassmann manifolds have also found applications in computer vision tasks of video-based face recognition and shape recognition,[24] and are used in the data-visualization technique known as the grand tour.

See also

Notes

  1. ↑ Lee 2012, p. 22, Example 1.36.
  2. ↑ Shafarevich 2013, p. 42, Example 1.24.
  3. ↑ (Milnor Stasheff), pp. 57–59.
  4. ↑ Grothendieck, Alexander (1971). ƉlĆ©ments de gĆ©omĆ©trie algĆ©brique. 1 (2nd ed.). Berlin, New York: Springer-Verlag. ISBN 978-3-540-05113-8. , Chapter I.9
  5. ↑ EGA, II.3.6.3.
  6. ↑ Griffiths, Phillip; Harris, Joseph (1994), Principles of algebraic geometry, Wiley Classics Library (2nd ed.), New York: John Wiley & Sons, p. 211, ISBN 0-471-05059-8 
  7. ↑ Witten, Edward (1993). "The Verlinde algebra and the cohomology of the Grassmannian". arXiv:hep-th/9312104.
  8. ↑ 8.0 8.1 Cartan, Ɖlie (1981) [1938]. The theory of spinors. New York: Dover Publications. ISBN 978-0-486-64070-9. https://books.google.com/books?isbn=0486640701. 
  9. ↑ Harnad, J.; Shnider, S. (1992). "Isotropic geometry and twistors in higher dimensions. I. The generalized Klein correspondence and spinor flags in even dimensions". Journal of Mathematical Physics (American Institute of Physics) 33 (9): 3197–3208. doi:10.1063/1.529538. Bibcode1992JMP....33.3197H. 
  10. ↑ Harnad, J.; Shnider, S. (1995). "Isotropic geometry and twistors in higher dimensions. II. Odd dimensions, reality conditions, and twistor superspaces". Journal of Mathematical Physics (American Institute of Physics) 36 (9): 1945–1970. doi:10.1063/1.531096. Bibcode1995JMP....36.1945H. 
  11. ↑ Narasimhan, M. S.; Ramanan, S. (1961). "Existence of Universal Connections". American Journal of Mathematics 83 (3): 563–572. doi:10.2307/2372896. 
  12. ↑ Narasimhan, M. S.; Ramanan, S. (1963). "Existence of Universal Connections II.". American Journal of Mathematics 85 (2): 223–231. doi:10.2307/2373211. 
  13. ↑ Mukhin, E.; Tarasov, V.; Varchenko, A. (2009). "Schubert Calculus and representations of the general linear group". J. Amer. Math. Soc. (American Mathematical Society) 22 (4): 909–940. doi:10.1090/S0894-0347-09-00640-7. 
  14. ↑ M. Sato, "Soliton equations as dynamical systems on infinite dimensional Grassmann manifolds", Kokyuroku, RIMS, Kyoto Univ., 30–46 (1981).
  15. ↑ 15.0 15.1 Date, Etsuro; Jimbo, Michio; Kashiwara, Masaki; Miwa, Tetsuji (1981). "Operator Approach to the Kadomtsev-Petviashvili Equation–Transformation Groups for Soliton Equations III–". Journal of the Physical Society of Japan (Physical Society of Japan) 50 (11): 3806–3812. doi:10.1143/jpsj.50.3806. ISSN 0031-9015. Bibcode1981JPSJ...50.3806D. 
  16. ↑ 16.0 16.1 Jimbo, Michio; Miwa, Tetsuji (1983). "Solitons and infinite-dimensional Lie algebras". Publications of the Research Institute for Mathematical Sciences (European Mathematical Society Publishing House) 19 (3): 943–1001. doi:10.2977/prims/1195182017. ISSN 0034-5318. 
  17. ↑ 17.0 17.1 Harnad, J.; Balogh, F. (2021). Tau functions and Their Applications, Chapts. 4 and 5. Cambridge Monographs on Mathematical Physics. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/9781108610902. ISBN 9781108610902. 
  18. ↑ Sato, Mikio (October 1981). "Soliton Equations as Dynamical Systems on Infinite Dimensional Grassmann Manifolds (Random Systems and Dynamical Systems)". ę•°ē†č§£ęžē ”ē©¶ę‰€č¬›ē©¶éŒ² 439: 30–46. http://hdl.handle.net/2433/102800. 
  19. ↑ Harnad, J.; Balogh, F. (2021). Tau functions and Their Applications, Chapt. 7. Cambridge Monographs on Mathematical Physics. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/9781108610902. ISBN 9781108610902. 
  20. ↑ Chakravarty, S.; Kodama, Y. (July 2009). "Soliton Solutions of the KP Equation and Application to Shallow Water Waves" (in en). Studies in Applied Mathematics 123: 83–151. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9590.2009.00448.x. 
  21. ↑ Kodama, Yuji; Williams, Lauren (December 2014). "KP solitons and total positivity for the Grassmannian" (in en). Inventiones Mathematicae 198 (3): 637–699. doi:10.1007/s00222-014-0506-3. Bibcode2014InMat.198..637K. 
  22. ↑ Hartnett, Kevin (16 December 2020). "A Mathematician's Unanticipated Journey Through the Physical World" (in en). https://www.quantamagazine.org/a-mathematicians-adventure-through-the-physical-world-20201216/. 
  23. ↑ Arkani-Hamed, Nima; Trnka, Jaroslav (2013). "The Amplituhedron". Journal of High Energy Physics 2014 (10): 30. doi:10.1007/JHEP10(2014)030. Bibcode2014JHEP...10..030A. 
  24. ↑ Pavan Turaga, Ashok Veeraraghavan, Rama Chellappa: Statistical analysis on Stiefel and Grassmann manifolds with applications in computer vision, CVPR 23–28 June 2008, IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2008, ISBN:978-1-4244-2242-5, pp. 1–8 (abstract, full text)
  25. ↑ Morel, Fabien; Voevodsky, Vladimir (1999). "A1-homotopy theory of schemes". Publications MathĆ©matiques de l'IHƉS 90 (90): 45–143. doi:10.1007/BF02698831. ISSN 1618-1913. http://archive.numdam.org/article/PMIHES_1999__90__45_0.pdf. Retrieved 2008-09-05. , see section 4.3., pp. 137–140

References