| Display title | Philosophy:Is–ought problem |
| Default sort key | Is-ought problem |
| Page length (in bytes) | 29,595 |
| Namespace ID | 3018 |
| Namespace | Philosophy |
| Page ID | 256266 |
| Page content language | en - English |
| Page content model | wikitext |
| Indexing by robots | Allowed |
| Number of redirects to this page | 0 |
| Counted as a content page | Yes |
| Page image |  |
| HandWiki item ID | None |
| Edit | Allow all users (infinite) |
| Move | Allow all users (infinite) |
| Page creator | imported>Rtexter1 |
| Date of page creation | 02:07, 8 February 2024 |
| Latest editor | imported>Rtexter1 |
| Date of latest edit | 02:07, 8 February 2024 |
| Total number of edits | 1 |
| Recent number of edits (within past 90 days) | 0 |
| Recent number of distinct authors | 0 |
Description | Content |
Article description: (description)
This attribute controls the content of the description and og:description elements. | The is–ought problem, as articulated by the Scottish philosopher and historian David Hume, arises when one makes claims about what ought to be that are based solely on statements about what is. Hume found that there seems to be a significant difference between positive (or descriptive) statements (about... |
