| Display title | Philosophy:Hart–Dworkin debate |
| Default sort key | Hart-Dworkin debate |
| Page length (in bytes) | 1,360 |
| Namespace ID | 3018 |
| Namespace | Philosophy |
| Page ID | 801655 |
| Page content language | en - English |
| Page content model | wikitext |
| Indexing by robots | Allowed |
| Number of redirects to this page | 0 |
| Counted as a content page | Yes |
| HandWiki item ID | None |
| Edit | Allow all users (infinite) |
| Move | Allow all users (infinite) |
| Page creator | imported>LinXED |
| Date of page creation | 08:30, 8 July 2022 |
| Latest editor | imported>LinXED |
| Date of latest edit | 08:30, 8 July 2022 |
| Total number of edits | 1 |
| Recent number of edits (within past 90 days) | 0 |
| Recent number of distinct authors | 0 |
Description | Content |
Article description: (description)
This attribute controls the content of the description and og:description elements. | The Hart–Dworkin debate is a debate in legal philosophy between H. L. A. Hart and Ronald Dworkin. At the heart of the debate lies a Dworkinian critique of Hartian legal positivism, specifically, the theory presented in Hart's book The Concept of Law. While Hart insists that judges are within... |
