| Display title | Criticism of non-standard analysis |
| Default sort key | Criticism of non-standard analysis |
| Page length (in bytes) | 28,620 |
| Namespace ID | 0 |
| Page ID | 228304 |
| Page content language | en - English |
| Page content model | wikitext |
| Indexing by robots | Allowed |
| Number of redirects to this page | 0 |
| Counted as a content page | Yes |
| HandWiki item ID | None |
| Edit | Allow all users (infinite) |
| Move | Allow all users (infinite) |
| Page creator | imported>LinXED |
| Date of page creation | 04:17, 1 December 2022 |
| Latest editor | imported>LinXED |
| Date of latest edit | 04:17, 1 December 2022 |
| Total number of edits | 1 |
| Recent number of edits (within past 90 days) | 0 |
| Recent number of distinct authors | 0 |
Description | Content |
Article description: (description)
This attribute controls the content of the description and og:description elements. | Non-standard analysis and its offshoot, non-standard calculus, have been criticized by several authors, notably Errett Bishop, Paul Halmos, and Alain Connes. These criticisms are analyzed below. |
